Tag: opinion

  • “One Art” by Elizabeth Bishop – MLA Style Analysis Essay for English 101

    “One Art” by Elizabeth Bishop – MLA Style Analysis Essay for English 101

    Essay Requirements:

    For the poem selected, make a claim about how the LAST image or idea (the “ending”) is related to the meaning of the rest of the poem. Furthermore, consider how the formal elements of the poem help convey that meaning and attitude.

    Author Comments about Paper

    The use of my outside sources in this paper ended up with me losing some points on this assignment. The content was solid according to the teacher, however I must have not been clear on the use of outside sources when I turned the paper in. Overall, the poem “One Art” by Elizabeth Bishop is a unique look at loss and how it effects us.

    Introduction

    What are the first thoughts that come into the mind when hearing the word “Loss”? Losing is not a science or skill and some would argue that life is built to lose. A great way to help answer and focus in on some of these questions would be to read “One Art” by Elizabeth Bishop. Bishop, a Poet Laureate from 1949-1950 and a Pulitzer Prize winner in 1956 (PoemHunter) was very articulate and passionate in her writings. The poem “One Art” focuses on the art of losing and how to interpret loss. The last ideas given by Bishop coincide with the rest of the writings meanings, those including acceptance, compassion, realistic expectations, participation, and realizing the potential for positive growth. Through her writing, Bishop exhibits the attributes of loss one must be aware of in order to triumph over it.

    Body Paragraph 1

    Bishop encourages the reader to show acceptance and compassion to loss, as shown throughout and in the last stanza of her writing. The last stanza goes like so:

    “Even losing you (the joking voice, a gesture
    I love) I shan’t have lied. It’s evident
    the art of losing’s not too hard to master
    though it may look like (Write it!) like a disaster.” (Lines 16-19)

    In the last stanza the author wraps up the poem with a moment of compassionate thought during a loss, as she explains, “Even losing you (the joking voice, a gesture I love)” (16). Selecting her words carefully, “Love” is used only once in the poem, showing Bishops compassion and the words “Even losing you” mark the important tone of acceptance in the poem. These lines are one of the most direct references in the poem to a painful loss for Bishop. In addition to the latter, Bishop opens the poem with one line that will be seen throughout the poem, tellingly, “The art of losing isn’t hard to master” (1). This phrase or similar to that was repeated in four of six stanzas in the writing. The repetition she chooses in her stanzas gives a reader the sense of Bishop actually encouraging those to accept loss, given that, loss “. . . isn’t hard to master” (1).
    Loss is something that is repeated continuously throughout life as well as in Bishops poem. With the repetition of loss in “One Art”, Bishop provides opportunities for the reader to interpret it, one of those being the idea that a loss may at times appear more destructive in nature than they actually are.

    Body Paragraph 2

    Even with all the losses that life can bring, many times those losses have the appearance of something much worse than the reality; this is why realistic expectations are important for Bishop in defeating loss. These realistic expectations help guide her through unclear situations. Bishop shows the reader that losses are not always an actual disaster, “. . . though it may look like (Write it!)” (19). Bishop tells the reader to “Write it”, meaning to write a select losing scenario, like a disaster for example. Could one write a disaster or losing scenario with an exaggerated outcome than the reality of it? The short answer is – yes. Just in the past decade we had the scare of the Y2K crisis. This took place in the year of 2000 and there were many articles, interviews, and discussions of it. During this time it was safe to say that many were preparing for a very different world. As we know for a fact today in 2012, all writing and theories about a doomsday year of 2000 proved to be false. A loss on paper can always be scarier than the reality of it. A reader can take away from Bishops poem that “. . . though it may look like (Write it!)” (19) a seemingly guaranteed loss or disaster may in fact be exactly the opposite. The fear of loss can certainly bring people to act differently and affect their actions. Rather than fearing, the embracement of loss can be a good trait to learn and keep. Remembering that loss can also turn into growth, there is potential and opportunity for something entirely new and positive to come into play.

    Body Paragraph 3

    Embracing loss can be a wonderful thing when you accept it, being that not all loss will lead to disaster and has potential to grow into something healthy and bountiful once again. Bishop expands on this idea of potential for growth out of loss and appears to assist Bishop to get over loss itself. Further she explains to the reader the numerous losses she has taken, such as vast realms of property once owned and “. . . two rivers, a continent” (14), “I miss them, but it wasn’t a disaster” (15). Digging for more answers, we can find abundant clues on times when a loss isn’t actually a complete disaster. Take the eruption on May of 1980 of Mt. St Helens in Washington State. The instant of the eruption there was instantaneous death and destruction of all natural and man-made structures near the blast zone. Effecting approximately 230-square miles, many areas that received the brunt of the blast looked much like a wasteland. Some of the first plant life returned to the affected area of Mt. St Helens years later around 1984, while Elk were spotted just a few weeks after initial blast. In addition to the birds, gophers, plant life and other wild life returning to the area, the blast zone is becoming the breeding ground for new life and abundance. (Mount St. Helens, Washington Life Returns to Mount St. Helens). It is understandable for one to miss the loss of what Mt. St Helens used to be, pre 1980 eruption, “. . .but it wasn’t a disaster” (15). From this example, it becomes clearer for a reader that in order to triumph over loss; there must also be participation in loss.

    Body Paragraph 4

    Bishop clearly encourages the reader’s actual participation in loss from her writing, harping back on that phrase many have or will hear sometime in their lives, “Practice Makes Perfect”. With more practice, one is trained and disciplined, therefore could handle loss more efficiently. The encouragement of participation in loss is readily apparent in the third stanza of the poem, with the idea being that by promoting the acceptance of loss, one may have an easier time triumphing over it. The author reminds the reader about daily loss, which would be considered normal, such as forgetting “. . . places, and names” (8). Bishop further directs the reader to, “practice losing farther, losing faster” (7). Living daily life is the practice for learning to lose quickly and/or more efficiently. At times we may forget what it is or who we are losing and why, due to the “practice” of losing. This is relatable to young individuals, during the first decade or two of life, everything seems new and exciting, but as they age, they lose interest and excitement on aspects that once would seem irresistible. From commonality and repetition, this kind of loss is no disaster for one’s life, as age does bring its own new experiences. This practice of learning to lose is achieved over time and is something everyone must accept sooner or later.

    Conclusion

    Bishop paints a picture clearer than most may care to think about loss. She shows through her writing that in order to triumph over loss, one must learn the attributes of acceptance, compassion, participation, realistic expectations, and realizing the potential for positive growth. She reminds us through the writing that the art of losing doesn’t mean disaster. There is a positive message made out of loss, even with all of the loss detailed in the writing. Next time you are dealing with a loss, positive or negative, remember it most likely won’t be a disaster and could very well be a learning lesson. What have you lost today?

    Works Cited

    “PoemHunter.” n.d. Biography of Elizabeth Bishop. Web. 08 Oct 2012.

    “Mount St. Helens, Washington Life Returns to Mount St. Helens.” 30 Sept 2004. USGS Cascades Volcano Observatory (CVO). Web. 08 Oct 2012.

    Tomajczyk , Stephen F. 101 Ways to Survive the Y2K Crisis. St. Martin’s Griffin, 1999. Web.

  • A “Private” Response on Ron Paul

    A “Private” Response on Ron Paul

    This short response is a reply to a comment on Ron Paul via Facebook. Names have been omitted for privacy reasons

    It is very difficult to achieve change when you are working with an “Establishment” – that is a Washington DC that is full of corruption via special interests. He always votes against raising the debt ceiling, but everyone else is voting for it? How does that make sense?

    Ron Paul stands against everything the “Status quo” stands for and if nothing else would put a “Brake” on how things are run in DC if President. This would give a chance for a turn around in that Ron Paul would not BS the American public about the reality of our situation, which would be an absolute disaster for the current establishment as this would actually educate the American public instead of the real smoke and mirrors from the Federal Govt. You do make a good point about Che Guevara!

    It doesn’t take that much looking to see inflation is out of control and our dollar is still sinking in value, much of this due to, again, the out of control spending in DC. So weird how the federal government tries to “Fix” all the problems accept the most apparent one with a HUGE RED FLAG hanging out (debt). This is why we need Ron Paul and people who value the constitution in the cabinet, congress, and the house.

    Special interests come with $$ and the politicians fall in line, but that is not the case with Paul nor has it ever been. Ron Paul does not accept money from special interests – an extremely rare and uncommon for someone who has spent time in government. Ron Paul also donates a portion of his salary back to the US Treasury – to help pay down the debt (kind of laughable, but good to know!)

    Ron Paul is the reason the Federal Reserve was audited (See: http://www.unelected.org/audit-of-the-federal-reserve-reveals-16-trillion-in-secret-bailouts)

    Ron Paul actually had a practice at a private job as a OBGYN and delivered something like 4k babies & treated the poor for free at his clinic

    Ron Paul will end the “war on drugs” – which happens to end up being the most racist and harmful program they have created for the working class and minorities in particular. All you have to do is look in the prisons and jails.

    Ron Paul want to end the Federal Income Tax (cites it as unconstitutional) and replace it with nothing – this helps the working class with an instant and permanent raise on all income levels. (A *REAL* stimulus)

    Ron Paul wants to allow young workers to opt out of social security – this helps the working class. Everyone else will get to keep their benefits. If I were to opt out for example – there would always be the option to just take this money from the government and invest it in your privately held account so they don’t decide how much of your money you get back!

    Ron Paul is big on individual responsibility and states rights – the idea that Issues can be handled with local government to figure out what works best for those citizens on most issues.

    Do I agree with everything Ron Paul says? I can’t say I do. I do make an attempt to research my information and spread out my sources to get different views – as I am trying not to spread false information! lol

    Obama has unfortunately continued the status quo and is spending an enormous amount of money that we don’t have. They haven’t even passed a budget for themselves. Only the American people have helped the US Economy – I give the president or congress NO credit for that. We will soon be required to pay a new healthcare tax on top of this in 2014? Whew – I am going to be a lot broker a lot quicker come that time unless I see a raise sometime soon lol.

    Spending is like a drug up there in DC – Being blinded by the $BLING$ is easy I guess lol.

    Ron Paul is doing one thing right for sure – waking up a new generation to the realities we face – hopefully some of us outsiders like me and you can make it in and make a real change, that is the hope and goal. Dr. Paul really is a man of integrity and honesty, which I really like. I do plan to run for some local offices, just to make a small difference in my community and to promote the positive change I seek.

    Thank you for the reminder also it always helps to get others viewpoints and the conversation is great I really enjoy it – I know politics can get a bit edgy…. you should have been at the convention! lol

    Here is the budget he proposes if you want to check it out:

    http://www.ronpaul2012.com/the-issues/ron-paul-plan-to-restore-america/